Pielęgniarstwo i Zdrowie Publiczne

Piel. Zdr. Publ.
Index Copernicus (ICV) – 69,56
Ogólny współczynnik odrzuceń – 24,41%
ISSN 2082-9876 (print)
ISSN 2451-1870 (online)
Periodyczność – kwartalnik

Pobierz oryginał (EN)

Pielęgniarstwo i Zdrowie Publiczne Nursing and Public Health

2020, tom 10, nr 1, styczeń-marzec, str. 13–18

doi: 10.17219/pzp/112223

Typ publikacji: praca oryginalna

Język publikacji: angielski

Pobierz cytowania:

  • BIBTEX (JabRef, Mendeley)
  • RIS (Papers, Reference Manager, RefWorks, Zotero)

Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 3.0 Open Access

Factors affecting patient tolerance of unsedated upper gastrointestinal tract endoscopy

Czynniki wpływające na tolerancję endoskopii górnego odcinka przewodu pokarmowego bez sedacji

Barbara Maślanka-Seiffert1,2,A,B,D,F, Piotr Seiffert3,A,B,D,F, Agnieszka Olchowska-Kotala4,C,E,F, Radosław Kempiński5,A,E,F

1 Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Medical University of Silesia, Katowice

2 Geriatric Ward, The Municipal Hospital of Chorzów, Poland

3 John Paul II Geriatric Hospital, Katowice, Poland

4 Department of Humanistic Sciences in Medicine, Wroclaw Medical University, Poland

5 Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Wroclaw Medical University, Poland

Abstract

Background. Endoscopy of the upper gastrointestinal tract is a widely used diagnostic procedure. It can be a source of anxiety, discomfort and even pain for the patients.
Objectives. The aim of the study was to assess the discomfort and anxiety associated with gastroscopy, examine their determinants and describe patients’ preferences regarding medical procedures and personnel behavior.
Material and Methods. The study involved 50 patients (21 men and 29 women) who underwent an endoscopy of the upper gastrointestinal tract. The State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) was employed, as well as the authors’ own two-part questionnaire, which was conducted before and after the endoscopy.
Results. The average level of anxiety was 40.72 STAI points and the emetic reflex was its main source (52%). The average level of discomfort felt during the gastroscopy was 2.84 and was related to both age (p = 0.001), security and privacy during the examination (p = 0.03), as well as to the level of anxiety prior to examination (p = 0.05). The severity of the discomfort was not associated with gender, education or subjective assessment of knowledge about the examination. Half of the patients would have liked to be sedated. A majority of the respondents (61%) indicated that verbal reassurance is a desirable form of behavior of the medical staff.
Conclusion. The main cause of patients’ anxiety is fear of the discomfort associated with the emetic reflex. The discomfort experienced by patients during endoscopy is linked to their age group, with younger participants experiencing greater discomfort, higher levels of anxiety prior to the examination, and a lower sense of security and privacy. Patients value verbal reassurance, procedural information and behavioral instructions during the endoscopy. General sedation is preferred by patients.

Streszczenie

Wprowadzenie. Endoskopia górnego odcinka przewodu pokarmowego jest rozpowszechnionym badaniem diagnostycznym. Może stanowić dla pacjenta źródło lęku, dyskomfortu, a nawet bólu.
Cel pracy. Celem badania była ocena dyskomfortu i lęku związanego z gastroskopią, zbadanie ich determinantów oraz określenie oczekiwań pacjentów odnośnie do procedur medycznych i zachowania personelu.
Materiał i metody. Przebadano 50 pacjentów (21 mężczyzn i 29 kobiet) poddanych endoskopii górnego odcinka przewodu pokarmowego. Do badania wykorzystano Inwentarz Stanu i Cechy Lęku STAI oraz dwuczęściową autorską ankietę przeprowadzaną przed endoskopią i po niej.
Wyniki. Średni poziom lęku wynosił 40,72 pkt STAI, a odruch wymiotny był jego głównym źródłem (52%). Średni poziom odczuwanego dyskomfortu podczas gastroskopii wynosił 2,84 i był związany zarówno z wiekiem (p = 0,001), bezpieczeństwem i prywatnością podczas badania (p = 0,03), jak i poziomem lęku przed badaniem (p = 0,05). Nasilenie dyskomfortu nie było związane z płcią, wykształceniem i subiektywną oceną wiedzy o badaniu. Połowa pacjentów zadeklarowała chęć użycia sedacji. Spośród respondentów 61% wskazało, że wsparcie werbalne jest pożądaną formą zachowania personelu medycznego.
Wnioski. Główną przyczyną niepokoju pacjentów jest lęk przed dyskomfortem związanym z odruchem wymiotnym. Dyskomfort odczuwalny podczas endoskopii jest większy u młodszych pacjentów, związany z wyższym poziomem lęku przed badaniem i mniejszym poczuciem bezpieczeństwa i prywatności. Pacjenci doceniają wsparcie werbalne, informacje proceduralne i instrukcje behawioralne podczas endoskopii, a także oczekują możliwości zastosowania optymalnej sedacji.

Key words

anxiety, gastroscopy, discomfort

Słowa kluczowe

lęk, gastroskopia, dyskomfort

Piśmiennictwo (34)

  1. Lapalus M, Saurin J. Complications of gastrointestinal endoscopy: Gastroscopy and colonoscopy [in French]. Gastroenterol Clin Biol. 2003;27(10):909–921.
  2. Levy I, Gralnek I. Complications of diagnostic colonoscopy, upper endoscopy and enteroscopy. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2016;30(5):705–718. doi:10.1016/j.bpg.2016.09.005
  3. Mulcahy H, Kelly P, Banks M, et al. Factors associated with tolerance to, and discomfort with, unsedated diagnostic gastroscopy. Scandinavian J Gastroenterol. 2001;36(12):1352–1357. doi:10.1080/003655201317097245
  4. Pontone S, Tonda M, Brighi M, Florio M, Pironi D, Pontone P. Does anxiety or waiting time influence patients’ tolerance of upper endoscopy? Saudi J Gastroenterol. 2015;21(2):111–115. doi:10.4103/1319-3767.153839
  5. Brandt L. Patients’ attitudes and apprehensions about endoscopy: How to calm troubled waters. Am J Gastroenterol. 2001;96(2):280–284. doi:10.1111/j.1572-0241.2001.03508.x
  6. Chuah S, Goh K, Wong N. Common anxieties of patients undergoing oesophago-gastro-duodenoscopy, colonoscopy and endoscopic retrograde cholangio-pancreatography. Med J Malaysia. 1999;54(2):216–224.
  7. Spielberger C, Gorsuch R, Lushene R. The State-Trait Anxiety Inventory: Test Manual. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press; 1970.
  8. Campo R, Brullet E, Montserrat A, et al. Identification of factors that influence tolerance of upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 1999;11(2):201–204. doi:10.1097/00042737-199902000-00023
  9. Hoya Y, Matsumura I, Fujita T, Yanaga K. The use of nonpharmacological interventions to reduce anxiety in patients undergoing gastroscopy in a setting with an optimal soothing environment. Gastroenterol Nurs. 2008;31(6):395–399. doi:10.1097/SGA.0b013e31818eb5c9
  10. Ünal HÜ, Korkmaz M, Özüçürümez G, et al. The effect of pre-endoscopy anxiety level on tolerance of the procedure and the amount of sedative drug dose. Endosk Gastrointest. 2011;19(2):47–51. http://endoskopi.tgv.org.tr/journal/8/pdf/77.pdf. Accessed on December 9, 2019.
  11. Ersöz F, Toros A, Aydoğan G, Bektaş H, Ozcan O, Arikan S. Assessment of anxiety levels in patients during elective upper gastrointestinal endoscopy and colonoscopy. Turk J Gastroenterol. 2010;21(1):29–33. doi:10.4318/tjg.2010.0044
  12. Kutlutürkan S, Görgülü U, Fesci H, Karavelioglu A. The effects of providing pre-gastrointestinal endoscopy written educational material on patients’ anxiety: A randomised controlled trial. Int J Nurs Stud. 2010;47(9):1066–1073. doi:10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2010.01.007
  13. Behrouzian F, Sadrizadeh N, Nematpour S, Seyedian SS, Nassiryan M, Zadeh AJF. The effect of psychological preparation on the level of anxiety before upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. J Clin Diagn Res. 2017;11(7):VC01–VC04. doi:10.7860/JCDR/2017/24876.10270
  14. El-Hassan H, McKeown K, Muller A. Clinical trial: Music reduces anxiety levels in patients attending for endoscopy. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2009;30(7):718–724. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2036.2009.04091.x
  15. Pehlıvan S, Ovayolu N, Koruk M, Pehlıvan Y, Ovayolu O, Gülşen MT. Effect of providing information to the patient about upper gastrointestinal endoscopy on the patient’s perception, compliance and anxiety level associated with the procedure. Turk J Gastroenterol. 2011;22(1):10–17. doi:10.4318/tjg.2011.0150
  16. Walmsley R, Montgomery S. Factors affecting patient tolerance of upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. J Clin Gastroenterol. 1998;26(4):253–255. doi:10.1097/00004836-199806000-00006
  17. Seip B, Huppertz-Hauss G, Sauar J, Bretthauer M, Hoff G. Patients’ satisfaction: An important factor in quality control of gastroscopies. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2008;43(8):1004–1011. doi:10.1080/00365520801958592
  18. Thanvi B, Munshi S, Vijayakumar N, Taub N, Lo T. Acceptability of oesophagogastroduodenoscopy without intravenous sedation: Patients’ versus endoscopist’s perception with special reference to older patients. Postgrad Med J. 2003;79(937):650–651. doi:10.1136/pmj.79.937.650
  19. Liu YY, Liu YQ, Petrini MA. Effect of information of patients’ coping style on pregastroscopy anxiety. Gastroenterol Nurs. 2018;41(1):47–58. doi:10.1097/SGA.0000000000000302
  20. van Vliet MJ, Grypdonck M, van Zuuren FJ, Winnubst J, Kruitwagen C. Preparing patients for gastrointestinal endoscopy: The influence of information in medical situations. Patient Educ Couns. 2004;52(1):23–30. doi:10.1016/s0738-3991(02)00245-8
  21. Toomey D, Hackett-Brennan M, Corrigan G, Singh C, Nessim G, Balfe P. Effective communication enhances the patients’ endoscopy experience. Ir J Med Sci. 2016;185(1):203–214. doi:10.1007/s11845-015-1270-0
  22. Nasiri J, Khatib N, Kheiri S, Najafi M. The influence of escort during upper endoscopy and colonoscopy on patient satisfaction and anxiety. J Family Med Prim Care. 2016;5(1):134–138. doi:10.4103/2249-4863.184638
  23. Shapira M, Tamir A. Presence of family member during upper endoscopy: What do patients and escorts think? J Clin Gastroenterol. 1996;22(4):272–274. doi:10.1097/00004836-199606000-00006
  24. Ladas S, Aabakken L, Rey J, et al. Use of sedation for routine diagnostic upper gastrointestinal endoscopy: A European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Survey of National Endoscopy Society Members. Digestion. 2006;74(2):69–77. doi:10.1159/000097466
  25. Riphaus A, Geist F, Wehrmann T. Endoscopic sedation and monitoring practice in Germany: Re-evaluation from the first nationwide survey 3 years after the implementation of an evidence and consent based national guideline. Z Gastroenterol. 2013;51(9):1082–1088. doi:10.4253/wjge.v7.i2.102
  26. Ladas S, Satake Y, Mostafa I, Morse J. Sedation practices for gastrointestinal endoscopy in Europe, North America, Asia, Africa and Australia. Digestion. 2010;82(2):74–76. doi:10.1159/000285248
  27. Cohen L, Wecsler J, Gaetano J, et al. Endoscopic sedation in the United States: Results from a nationwide survey. Am J Gastroenterol. 2006;101(5):967–974. doi:10.1111/j.1572-0241.2006.00500.x
  28. Wang T, Lin J. Worldwide use of sedation and analgesia for upper intestinal endoscopy: Sedation for upper GI endoscopy in Taiwan. Gastrointest Endosc. 1999;50(6):888–889. doi:10.1016/s0016-5107(99)70188-4
  29. Faulx A, Vela S, Das A, et al. The changing landscape of practice patterns regarding unsedated endoscopy and propofol use: A national Web survey. Gastrointest Endosc. 2005;62(1):9–15. doi:10.1016/s0016-5107(05)00518-3
  30. Bruhn J. The doctor’s touch: Tactile communication in the doc­tor-patient relationship. South Med J. 1978;71(12):1469–1473. doi:10.1097/00007611-197812000-00008
  31. Watson J, Goss C, Phelps G. Audit of sedated versus unsedated gastroscopy: Do patients notice a difference? J Qual Clin Pract. 2001;21(1–2):26–29. doi:10.1046/j.1440-1762.2001.00391.x
  32. Woloshynowych M, Oakley D, Saunders B, Williams C. Psychological aspects of gastrointestinal endoscopy: A review. Endoscopy. 1996;28(9):763–767. doi:10.1055/s-2007-1005602
  33. Comstock L, Hooper E, Goodwin J. Physician behaviours that correlate with patient satisfaction. J Med Educ. 1982;57(2):105–112. doi:10.1097/00001888-198202000-00005
  34. Tierney M, Bevan R, Rees C, Trebble T. What do patients want from their endoscopy experience? The importance of measuring and understanding patient attitudes to their care. Frontline Gastroenterol. 2016;7(3):191–198. doi:10.1136/flgastro-2015-100574
© Uniwersytet Medyczny im. Piastów Śląskich we Wrocławiu